0.00/0.02 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.09/0.36 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu 0.09/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.09/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.09/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB 0.09/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic 0.10/0.36 % CPULimit : 1440 0.10/0.36 % WCLimit : 180 0.10/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Jul 27 11:03:22 UTC 2026 0.10/0.36 % CPUTime : 0.10/0.36 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 180 THM 0.10/0.40 Running higher-order theorem proving 0.10/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=180 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Sa2Vt7UsBN/E---3.1_1289849.p 168.50/26.79 % Version: 3.5.1-ho 168.50/26.79 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA. 168.50/26.79 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 168.50/26.79 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting ho_unfolding_2 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % new_ho_10_unif with pid 1289866 completed with status 0 168.50/26.79 % Result found by new_ho_10_unif 168.50/26.79 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA. 168.50/26.79 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 168.50/26.79 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 168.50/26.79 % No SInE strategy applied 168.50/26.79 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHHFFSBN 168.50/26.79 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 168.50/26.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1289874 completed with status 8 168.50/26.79 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 60s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % new_ho_10_unif with pid 1289880 completed with status 0 168.50/26.79 % Result found by new_ho_10_unif 168.50/26.79 % Preprocessing class: HSMSSMSSSSSNHHA. 168.50/26.79 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 8 cores with 180 seconds (1440 total) 168.50/26.79 % Starting full_lambda_6 with 540s (3) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting post_as_ho1 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting lpo6_lambda_fix with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting ho_unfolding_1 with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 180s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto) 168.50/26.79 % No SInE strategy applied 168.50/26.79 % Search class: HGHNF-FFSF22-SHHFFSBN 168.50/26.79 % Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 180 seconds (180 total) 168.50/26.79 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 19s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % SubtermCWHack with pid 1289874 completed with status 8 168.50/26.79 % Starting new_ho_10_unif with 60s (1) cores 168.50/26.79 % Preprocessing time : 0.001 s 168.50/26.79 % Presaturation interreduction done 168.50/26.79 168.50/26.79 % Proof found! 168.50/26.79 % SZS status Theorem 168.50/26.79 % SZS output start CNFRefutation 168.50/26.79 thf(decl_sort1, type, a: $tType). 168.50/26.79 thf(decl_23, type, epred1_0: a > a > $o). 168.50/26.79 thf(decl_24, type, esk1_0: (a > $o) > a). 168.50/26.79 thf(decl_25, type, esk2_2: (a > $o) > a > a). 168.50/26.79 thf(decl_26, type, esk3_0: a > a). 168.50/26.79 thf(cTHM145_A_pme, conjecture, ![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:(((![X3:a > $o]:(((![X4:a]:((![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X4)<=((X3 @ X5)&(X3 @ X5))))=>((X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4)&(X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4))))&![X6:a]:(((X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))<=(X3 @ X6))))&![X6:a]:(((X3 @ X6)=>(X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))))))&![X7:a, X8:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X7 @ X6)<=((X1 @ X7 @ X8)&(X1 @ X8 @ X6)))))=>![X9:a > a]:((?[X10:a]:(((X1 @ X10 @ (X9 @ X10))&(X1 @ (X9 @ X10) @ X10)))<=(![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))<=(X1 @ X7 @ X8)))&![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))<=(X1 @ X7 @ X8)))))))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.Sa2Vt7UsBN/E---3.1_1289849.p', cTHM145_A_pme)). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_1, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:(((![X3:a > $o]:(((![X4:a]:((![X5:a]:(((X1 @ X5 @ X4)<=((X3 @ X5)&(X3 @ X5))))=>((X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4)&(X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4))))&![X6:a]:(((X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))<=(X3 @ X6))))&![X6:a]:(((X3 @ X6)=>(X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))))))&![X7:a, X8:a, X6:a]:(((X1 @ X7 @ X6)<=((X1 @ X7 @ X8)&(X1 @ X8 @ X6)))))=>![X9:a > a]:((?[X10:a]:(((X1 @ X10 @ (X9 @ X10))&(X1 @ (X9 @ X10) @ X10)))<=(![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))<=(X1 @ X7 @ X8)))&![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))<=(X1 @ X7 @ X8))))))))), inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[cTHM145_A_pme])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_2, negated_conjecture, ~(![X1:a > a > $o, X2:(a > $o) > a]:(((![X3:a > $o]:(((![X4:a]:((![X5:a]:(((X3 @ X5)=>(X1 @ X5 @ X4)))=>(X1 @ (X2 @ X3) @ X4)))&![X6:a]:(((X3 @ X6)=>(X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3)))))&![X6:a]:(((X3 @ X6)=>(X1 @ X6 @ (X2 @ X3))))))&![X7:a, X8:a, X6:a]:((((X1 @ X7 @ X8)&(X1 @ X8 @ X6))=>(X1 @ X7 @ X6))))=>![X9:a > a]:((![X7:a, X8:a]:(((X1 @ X7 @ X8)=>(X1 @ (X9 @ X7) @ (X9 @ X8))))=>?[X10:a]:(((X1 @ X10 @ (X9 @ X10))&(X1 @ (X9 @ X10) @ X10)))))))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_1])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_3, negated_conjecture, ![X29:a > $o, X30:a, X32:a, X33:a, X34:a, X35:a, X36:a, X38:a, X39:a, X40:a]:((((((((X29 @ (esk2_2 @ X29 @ X30))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X29) @ X30))&(~(epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X29 @ X30) @ X30)|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X29) @ X30)))&(~(X29 @ X32)|(epred1_0 @ X32 @ (esk1_0 @ X29))))&(~(X29 @ X33)|(epred1_0 @ X33 @ (esk1_0 @ X29))))&(~(epred1_0 @ X34 @ X35)|~(epred1_0 @ X35 @ X36)|(epred1_0 @ X34 @ X36)))&((~(epred1_0 @ X38 @ X39)|(epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X38) @ (esk3_0 @ X39)))&(~(epred1_0 @ X40 @ (esk3_0 @ X40))|~(epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X40) @ X40))))), inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_2])])])])])])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X5:a, X6:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X6)|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X5 @ X6)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ X5)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_6, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X6:a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X6)))|~((epred1_0 @ X6 @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4, c_0_5])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_7, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X4:a]:(((X3 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X4))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3) @ X4))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk1_0 @ X3))|~((X3 @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a, X21:a > a, X9:a > a, X5:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X21 @ Z0))))) @ X4)) @ (esk3_0 @ X5))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X21 @ Z0)))))) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ (X21 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ (X9 @ Z0) @ (esk3_0 @ (X21 @ Z0))))) @ X4)) @ X5)))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_10, negated_conjecture, ![X1:a > a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0))) @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0)))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((X1 @ Z0 @ Z0)))) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_11, negated_conjecture, ![X3:a > $o, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ X3) @ X4)|~((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ X3 @ X4) @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk2_2 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))) @ X4) @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))))|(epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))) @ X4))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9, c_0_10])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_13, negated_conjecture, ![X9:a > a, X4:a]:(((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ (X9 @ Z0)))))))|~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (X9 @ (esk3_0 @ X4)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_5])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))) @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0))))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11, c_0_12])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ![X4:a]:((~((epred1_0 @ X4 @ (esk3_0 @ X4)))|~((epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ X4) @ X4)))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_16, negated_conjecture, (epred1_0 @ (esk3_0 @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))) @ (esk1_0 @ (^[Z0:a]:((epred1_0 @ Z0 @ (esk3_0 @ Z0)))))), inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13, c_0_14])). 168.50/26.79 thf(c_0_17, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15, c_0_16]), c_0_14])]), ['proof']). 168.50/26.79 % SZS output end CNFRefutation 168.50/26.79 % Parsed axioms : 2 168.50/26.79 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 168.50/26.79 % Initial clauses : 8 168.50/26.79 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 1 168.50/26.79 % Initial clauses in saturation : 7 168.50/26.79 % Processed clauses : 769 168.50/26.79 % ...of these trivial : 118 168.50/26.79 % ...subsumed : 235 168.50/26.79 % ...remaining for further processing : 416 168.50/26.79 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0 168.50/26.79 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 168.50/26.79 % Backward-subsumed : 29 168.50/26.79 % Backward-rewritten : 39 168.50/26.79 % Generated clauses : 39504 168.50/26.79 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 33987 168.50/26.79 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0 168.50/26.79 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0 168.50/26.79 % Paramodulations : 39342 168.50/26.79 % Factorizations : 161 168.50/26.79 % NegExts : 0 168.50/26.79 % Equation resolutions : 1 168.50/26.79 % Disequality decompositions : 0 168.50/26.79 % Total rewrite steps : 5885 168.50/26.79 % ...of those cached : 5134 168.50/26.79 % Propositional unsat checks : 0 168.50/26.79 % Propositional check models : 0 168.50/26.79 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 168.50/26.79 % Propositional clauses : 0 168.50/26.79 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0 168.50/26.79 % Propositional unsat core size : 0 168.50/26.79 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 168.50/26.79 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000 168.50/26.79 % Propositional solver time : 0.000 168.50/26.79 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 168.50/26.79 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 168.50/26.79 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000 168.50/26.79 % Current number of processed clauses : 342 168.50/26.79 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 82 168.50/26.79 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 168.50/26.79 % Negative unit clauses : 14 168.50/26.79 % Non-unit-clauses : 246 168.50/26.79 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 32776 168.50/26.79 % ...number of literals in the above : 100993 168.50/26.79 % Current number of archived formulas : 0 168.50/26.79 % Current number of archived clauses : 74 168.50/26.79 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 10349 168.50/26.79 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8764 168.50/26.79 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 258 168.50/26.79 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2248 168.50/26.79 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 168.50/26.79 % BW rewrite match attempts : 1688 168.50/26.79 % BW rewrite match successes : 48 168.50/26.79 % Condensation attempts : 769 168.50/26.79 % Condensation successes : 9 168.50/26.79 % Termbank termtop insertions : 10201525 168.50/26.79 % Search garbage collected termcells : 441 168.50/26.79 168.50/26.79 % ------------------------------------------------- 168.50/26.79 % User time : 21.770 s 168.50/26.79 % System time : 0.673 s 168.50/26.79 % Total time : 22.443 s 168.50/26.79 % Maximum resident set size: 3644 pages 168.50/26.79 168.50/26.79 % ------------------------------------------------- 168.50/26.79 % User time : 21.774 s 168.50/26.79 % System time : 0.678 s 168.50/26.79 % Total time : 22.452 s 168.50/26.79 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages 168.50/26.79 % E exiting 168.50/26.80 EOF